Administrative Requirements and Burden of Proof
Covered entities and business associates, as applicable, have the
burden of demonstrating that all required notifications have been
provided or that a use or disclosure of unsecured protected health
information did not constitute a breach. Thus, with respect to an
impermissible use or disclosure, a covered entity (or business
associate) should maintain documentation that all required notifications
were made, or, alternatively, documentation to demonstrate that
notification was not required: (1) its risk assessment demonstrating a
low probability that the protected health information has been
compromised by the impermissible use or disclosure; or (2) the
application of any other exceptions to the definition of “breach.”
Covered entities are also required to comply with certain
administrative requirements with respect to breach notification. For
example, covered entities must have in place written policies and
procedures regarding breach notification, must train employees on these
policies and procedures, and must develop and apply appropriate
sanctions against workforce members who do not comply with these
policies and procedures.
| A breach is, generally, an impermissible use or disclosure under the Privacy Rule that compromises the security or privacy of the protected health information. An impermissible use or disclosure of protected health information is presumed to be a breach unless the covered entity or business associate, as applicable, demonstrates that there is a low probability that the protected health information has been compromised based on a risk assessment of at least the following factors: The nature and extent of the protected health information involved, including the types of identifiers and the likelihood of re-identification;The unauthorized person who used the protected health information or to whom the disclosure was made;Whether the protected health information was actually acquired or viewed; andThe extent to which the risk to the protected health information has been mitigated.Covered entities and business associates, where applicable, have discretion to provide the required breach notifications following an impermissible ...read more |
| If a breach of unsecured protected health information occurs at or by a business associate, the business associate must notify the covered entity following the discovery of the breach. A business associate must provide notice to the covered entity without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days from the discovery of the breach. To the extent possible, the business associate should provide the covered entity with the identification of each individual affected by the breach as well as any other available information required to be provided by the covered entity in its notification to affected individuals. ...read more |
| Covered entities and business associates must only provide the required notifications if the breach involved unsecured protected health information. Unsecured protected health information is protected health information that has not been rendered unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to unauthorized persons through the use of a technology or methodology specified by the Secretary in guidance. This guidance was first issued in April 2009 with a request for public comment. The guidance was reissued after consideration of public comment received and specifies encryption and destruction as the technologies and methodologies for rendering protected health information unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to unauthorized individuals. Additionally, the guidance also applies to unsecured personal health record identifiable health information under the FTC regulations. Covered entities and business associates, as well as entities regulated by the FTC regulations, that secure information as specified by the guidance are relieved from providing notifications following the breach of such information. ...read more |
| Protected health information (PHI) is rendered unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to unauthorized individuals if one or more of the following applies: Electronic PHI has been encrypted as specified in the HIPAA Security Rule by “the use of an algorithmic process to transform data into a form in which there is a low probability of assigning meaning without use of a confidential process or key” (45 CFR 164.304 definition of encryption) and such confidential process or key that might enable decryption has not been breached. To avoid a breach of the confidential process or key, these decryption tools should be stored on a device or at a location separate from the data they are used to encrypt or decrypt. The encryption processes identified below have been tested by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and judged to meet this standard. Valid encryption processes for data at rest are ...read more |
|
July 2025
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
|
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
1/21/25 Healthcare Data Breaches and Their Devastating Impact
1/21/25 Your Essential Guide to Data Breach Reporting Procedures
1/21/25 Understanding Your Obligations in Data Breach Reporting
11/16/22 Administrative Requirements and Burden of Proof
11/16/22 Notification by a Business Associat
11/16/22 Breach Notification Requirements
11/16/22 Unsecured Protected Health Information and Guidance
11/16/22 Guidance to Render Unsecured Protected Health Information Unusable, Unreadable, or Indecipherable to Unauthorized Individuals
11/16/22 Definition of Breach
11/16/22 Breach Notification Rule
11/16/22 Notify Individuals
Blog Archives
January 2025 (3)
November 2022 (11)
Blog Labels
Data Breach Reporting (6)
Data Breach Notification (6)
ePHI Data (1)
Health Care Data (1)
|
