Administrative Requirements and Burden of Proof
Covered entities and business associates, as applicable, have the
burden of demonstrating that all required notifications have been
provided or that a use or disclosure of unsecured protected health
information did not constitute a breach. Thus, with respect to an
impermissible use or disclosure, a covered entity (or business
associate) should maintain documentation that all required notifications
were made, or, alternatively, documentation to demonstrate that
notification was not required: (1) its risk assessment demonstrating a
low probability that the protected health information has been
compromised by the impermissible use or disclosure; or (2) the
application of any other exceptions to the definition of “breach.”
Covered entities are also required to comply with certain
administrative requirements with respect to breach notification. For
example, covered entities must have in place written policies and
procedures regarding breach notification, must train employees on these
policies and procedures, and must develop and apply appropriate
sanctions against workforce members who do not comply with these
policies and procedures.
| Think about service providers. If service providers were involved, examine what personal information they can access and decide if you need to change their access privileges. Also, ensure your service providers are taking the necessary steps to make sure another breach does not occur. If your service providers say they have remedied vulnerabilities, verify that they really fixed things. Check your network segmentation. When you set up your network, you likely segmented it so that a breach on one server or in one site could not lead to a breach on another server or site. Work with your forensics experts to analyze whether your segmentation plan was effective in containing the breach. If you need to make any changes, do so now. Work with your forensics experts. Find out if measures such as encryption were enabled when the breach happened. Analyze backup or preserved data. Review logs to determine ...read more |
| The HIPAA Breach Notification Rule, 45 CFR §§ 164.400-414, requires HIPAA covered entities and their business associates to provide notification following a breach of unsecured protected health information. Similar breach notification provisions implemented and enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), apply to vendors of personal health records and their third party service providers, pursuant to section 13407 of the HITECH Act. ...read more |
| A breach is, generally, an impermissible use or disclosure under the Privacy Rule that compromises the security or privacy of the protected health information. An impermissible use or disclosure of protected health information is presumed to be a breach unless the covered entity or business associate, as applicable, demonstrates that there is a low probability that the protected health information has been compromised based on a risk assessment of at least the following factors: The nature and extent of the protected health information involved, including the types of identifiers and the likelihood of re-identification;The unauthorized person who used the protected health information or to whom the disclosure was made;Whether the protected health information was actually acquired or viewed; andThe extent to which the risk to the protected health information has been mitigated.Covered entities and business associates, where applicable, have discretion to provide the required breach notifications following an impermissible ...read more |
| Covered entities and business associates must only provide the required notifications if the breach involved unsecured protected health information. Unsecured protected health information is protected health information that has not been rendered unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to unauthorized persons through the use of a technology or methodology specified by the Secretary in guidance. This guidance was first issued in April 2009 with a request for public comment. The guidance was reissued after consideration of public comment received and specifies encryption and destruction as the technologies and methodologies for rendering protected health information unusable, unreadable, or indecipherable to unauthorized individuals. Additionally, the guidance also applies to unsecured personal health record identifiable health information under the FTC regulations. Covered entities and business associates, as well as entities regulated by the FTC regulations, that secure information as specified by the guidance are relieved from providing notifications following the breach of such information. ...read more |
|
February 2026
| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
|
|
Blog Home
Newest Blog Entries
1/21/25 Healthcare Data Breaches and Their Devastating Impact
1/21/25 Your Essential Guide to Data Breach Reporting Procedures
1/21/25 Understanding Your Obligations in Data Breach Reporting
11/16/22 Administrative Requirements and Burden of Proof
11/16/22 Notification by a Business Associat
11/16/22 Breach Notification Requirements
11/16/22 Unsecured Protected Health Information and Guidance
11/16/22 Guidance to Render Unsecured Protected Health Information Unusable, Unreadable, or Indecipherable to Unauthorized Individuals
11/16/22 Definition of Breach
11/16/22 Breach Notification Rule
11/16/22 Notify Individuals
Blog Archives
November 2022 (11)
January 2025 (3)
Blog Labels
Data Breach Notification (6)
Data Breach Reporting (6)
ePHI Data (1)
Health Care Data (1)
|
